Reviewing post-16 education in London

Principals and chairs of governors from most of London’s colleges assembled at City Hall last week for a briefing on the post-16 area review process. It’s not often that this group meets and although it happened without any great fanfare it may turn out to be an important milestone. The meeting was convened by the Greater London Authority working in partnership with London Councils, the London Enterprise Panel and the colleges themselves.

We heard from all the key partners about how the process will be managed. We can expect a rolling programme of reviews in the 5 sub-regions, probably starting in the spring of 2016. Each will be led by a steering group on which all colleges and other key stakeholders will be represented. There will also be a pan-London steering group to take a London-wide view.

It was reassuring to hear from those leading this process that:

  • London needs a city-wide vision for post-16 education and skills
  • The process is not simply driven by the need to make savings
  • There is no ‘blueprint’ or preferred institutional configuration
  • Significant providers who aren’t currently in scope could be encouraged to opt in

A sixth form college perspective:

I was asked to say a few words from the perspective of London’s 12 sixth form colleges and this is what I said:

London’s 12 sixth form colleges are making an important and distinctive contribution to raising the participation, achievement and progression of 16-19 year olds across London.

We offer a broad academic curriculum and many of us also offer a wide range of vocational programmes at all levels. If we have a specialism it’s the education of 16-19 year olds.

Our university progression rates are above the London average, which is itself above the national average, for all students and for disadvantaged students eligible for free school means (FSM).

15% of all young people in London who progress to university attended one of our 12 sixth form colleges.

20% of all disadvantaged young people in London who progressed to university attended one of our 12 sixth form colleges.

We are very committed to partnership: with each other, including at governor level, with schools, universities and employers and we have a strong record of promoting social mobility and community cohesion.

Research shows that we provide excellent value for money compared to all other post-16 providers

We have wide travel to learn areas which don’t fit neatly into LA areas.

As London embarks on these Area Reviews we need to do justice to the Sixth Form College educational experience.

We were asked to highlight one key opportunity and one key challenge:

A key opportunity is to make sure we learn from the success and popularity of London’s 12 sixth form colleges in order to help us raise achievement and progression across London in a way which provides both excellence and value for money.

A key challenge is to find ways to involve those other substantial specialist 16-18 providers in planning for a better system. This includes those in the school sector such as 16-19 schools and academies and sixth form centres.

Looking forward to a better future?

In the discussion I made two additional points:

We are all going to be investing a great deal of time and effort into the subregional steering groups. We will be improving our understanding of the system and building new trust and relationships which could serve our learners well. This is an investment in partnership which should not be lost after the process is over. The steering groups will have a role in monitoring the implementation of their recommendations, could they evolve into a new collaborative system?

London is currently carved up between 3 Regional School Commissioners as part of a wider patch. They inevitably have an interest in post-16 provision as some of it is in the academies they oversee. Would it not make sense to have a single education and skills commissioner for London, perhaps supported by sub-regional commissioners?

Finding hope

The advance planning for the London Area Reviews has been inclusive and consultative so far and this bodes well for the credibility and transparency of the process.

This is a difficult time for colleges with no shortage of reasons for anxiety. Funding cuts, structural and curriculum change do not make for an easy life. We have to seek out signs of hope wherever we can.

It was a grey November afternoon when we arrived at City Hall but as we left the meeting in the early evening, the bright lights of London’s skyscrapers twinkling from across the Thames seemed to suggest the possibility that if we worked together we could build a better future for London’s post-16 students.

See also:

The problem with England’s post-16 area reviews (September 2015)

Imagining a better future is the first step (August 2015)

What’s at stake in the new post-16 area reviews? (July 2015)

FullSizeRender (9)

About Eddie Playfair

I am a Senior Policy Manager at the Association of Colleges (AoC) having previously been a college principal for 16 years and a teacher before that. I live in East London and I blog in a personal capacity about education and culture. I also tweet at @eddieplayfair
This entry was posted in Education, Education policy and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Reviewing post-16 education in London

  1. Ian Phillips says:

    A good summary, thanks Eddie. And thanks, too, for your advocacy of the sixth form college sector.

    I take issue with only one sentence in your piece: “Each [sub-region] will be led by a steering group on which all colleges and other key stakeholders will be represented.” I left with the distinct impression that London Councils wishes to depart from one of the few constants in area reviews since they were dropped on our heads at the start of the summer vacation: namely, that all institutions which may be affected by an area view would participate in the steering groups so that independent corporations have a voice in – and an understanding of – the impacts.

    The new suggestion seemed to be that sub-areas would be too unwieldy if all colleges and stakeholders were included so there would be one representative of each class (one SFC Principal and governor, one FE Principal and governor – and so on) who would act as spokesperson and conduit for their class.

    There was clearly no agreement on this and both the Deputy Mayor and Joint Delivery Unit seemed to row back from this but I wouldn’t want your readers to leave with the impression that this is a done deal.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks Ian, my impression was that everyone agreed that every college would be represented on the steering group for their sub-region although there may be a case for not having the principal and the chair at every meeting as this makes for unwieldy numbers. I think the ‘group’ representation of colleges relates to the pan-London steering group. If my understanding is wrong, we will need to revisit this.


  3. Anne Corbett says:

    Keep imagining a better future. 16s to 19s such a crucial group. Turning chrysalises into butterflies.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s